Conclusions from the 66th Plenary Meeting of the Trade Contact Group on CBAM

2024/07/19

馃挜Customs Support Poland (Rusak) informs:
馃摚 On June 20, the Plenary Meeting of the Trade Contact Group (TCG) took place, during which the European Commission responded to the entrepreneurs’ letter on CBAM represented by CLECAT (European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services).
鉃★笍 The letter addressed several issues important from the industry’s perspective:
鈩癸笍 Retention of Default Values for „small” imports:
馃摝 Entrepreneurs: Requested retention of Default Values (DVs) for small imports to avoid administrative burden.
馃嚜馃嚭 EC: Confirmed the availability of Default Values (DVs) for the definitive period, with new DVs for individual countries planned for mid-2025.
鈩癸笍 Introduction of minimum thresholds for critical flows:
馃摝 Entrepreneurs’ letter: Proposed new minimum thresholds based on weight, value, volume, or CO2 emissions for smaller but higher-value consignments.
馃嚜馃嚭 Commission’s response: Exploring possibilities for new minimum thresholds for the definitive period, with analysis already underway.
鈩癸笍 Issues with third-party reporting:
馃摝 Entrepreneurs’ letter: Raised issues related to the complexities of CBAM reporting by representatives of importers.
馃嚜馃嚭 Commission’s response: Acknowledged the issue and confirmed understanding of the arguments presented, noting that any change would require and amendment to the base regulation.
鈩癸笍 Creation or recognition of „CBAM Authorised Representatives”:
馃摝 Entrepreneurs’ letter: Inquired about the Commission’s plans to amend CBAM regulations to allow for „CBAM Authorised Representatives” in reporting.
馃嚜馃嚭 Commission’s response: Expressed understanding of the need for alternatives such as „Authorised Representatives” and encouraged further discussion but did not confirm immediate legislative changes.
鈩癸笍 Inclusion of trade associations in the CBAM Expert Group:
馃摝 Entrepreneurs’ letter: Requested reconsideration of the inclusion of trade associations in the CBAM Expert Group.
馃嚜馃嚭 Commission’s response: Explained that the Expert Group focuses on technical verification and emission calculations, balancing meetings between production and trade associations.
鈩癸笍 Awareness and support for CBAM among traders:
馃摝 Entrepreneurs’ letter: Highlighted low awareness of CBAM among traders and emphasized the role of the broader logistics industry in providing support.
馃嚜馃嚭 Commission’s response: Asked for trade’s assistance in raising awareness about CBAM and confirmed ongoing reliance on logistics intermediaries as primary sources of information and support.

Conclusions from the 66th Plenary Meeting of the Trade Contact Group on CBAM
ZAPISZ SI臉 DO NEWSLETTERA